Bringing literacy and history closer together

David Wray and Maureen Lewis

The new statutory requirements for history in the primary school (QCA, 1998) specify that, among some other things, children at the end of Key Stage 2 should be expected to be able to:

Clearly neither of these requirements implies an exclusive focus on text in primary history - information sources can, of course, include artefacts, and children can record their understanding through pictorial or dramatic means. Nevertheless, with the increasing focus on literacy, it is inevitable that children’s reading and writing in history will continue to receive even greater attention from primary teachers. This increased attention poses two questions:

The Exeter Extending Literacy (EXEL) project has, over the past five years, been exploring ways in which teachers can incorporate literacy teaching into a range of curriculum areas and has developed a number of teaching strategies which appear to help with both the questions posed above. In this article we will describe some of the strategies we have developed which will help teachers ensure their children meet the statutory requirements in history. Further information about this work can be found in Wray & Lewis (1997).

Finding out in history

Most teachers will realise that simply asking children to ‘find out about’ a topic, be it The Romans, King Alfred, Life in Victorian Times or whatever, is likely to result in little more than children copying sections from their reference books. We have found that children engage much more profitably in finding out if they have, firstly, had the chance to discuss and record what they already know about the topic under consideration and, secondly, have been helped to ask more precise questions about this topic.

Techniques such as brainstorming and concept mapping can be used to assist both of these. Children can be asked to generate as many ideas as possible about a particular subject. When one Year 5 class were asked to brainstorm The Romans, they came up with the following list of ideas:

Their teacher then suggested that this list could be grouped together into topics and, after some discussion, the following groups of words were assembled.

Places and people

Rome
Hadrian’s Wall
Emperors
Julius Caesar
Britain
Everyday life

road
villas
wine
Clothes

toga
sandals

Entertainment

feasts
gladiators

Each group was then used to generate questions the children could go on to answer. In Places and People, for example, children wanted to know who Hadrian and Julius Caesar were and why we have remembered their names. In Clothes, the question was asked, what else did the Romans wear? These questions were then followed up by groups of children.

We have also found that grids can be very useful in both of these areas. The KWL grid (What do I KNOW about this topic?: What do I WANT to know?: What did I LEARN?) can help scaffold children into a process of inquiry. An example KWL grid is given below.

What do I KNOW
about this topic?
What do I WANT
to know?
What did I learn?
     

A writing frame consists of a skeleton outline to scaffold children's writing. The skeleton framework consists of different key words or phrases, according to the particular generic form. The template of starters, connectives and sentence modifiers which constitute a writing frame gives children a structure within which they can concentrate on communicating what they want to say, rather than getting lost in the form. However, by using the form, children become increasingly familiar with it.

The activities briefly described here are in essence literacy activities in that they focus on children interpreting and creating non-fiction texts. The texts they involve have, of course, to be about something and the fact that in these examples they are historical texts means that at the same time as developing their literacy, children are also giving attention to history. The literacy hour can therefore be used to develop historical understanding, as long as its prime purpose of focusing on reading and writing is maintained.

References

QCA (1998) Maintaining breadth and balance at Key Stages 1 and 2 London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority

Wray, D. & Lewis, M. (1997) Extending Literacy London: Routledge